Why Muslims need to cool down on Ayodhya issue


Talk about Babri Masjid. A Mosque in Ayodhya, India. One of the largest mosques in the state of UP. Mosque’s inscriptions suggest that it was built in 1528-29 by Mir Baqi, on orders of the then Mughal Emperor Babur. So it is called “Babri Masjid”.

Babur was one of the most dubious and tyrant emperors of history. His bravery relied on his BEING MUSLIM tactics as he declared many of his battles, including the battle against Rana Sanga of Mewar, as Jihad to gain support from all the Muslims around the world. He also assumed the title of Ghazi after his victory at Khanwa in 1527, despite his wars being nowhere close to protect Muslims but to destroy non-Muslims.
The genocide suffered by the Hindus of India at 
the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and Afghan 
occupying forces for a period of 800 years 
is as yet formally unrecognised by the World.
After Babur’s victory over Indian rulers, he showed severe discrimination against Hindus. Imprisoned many of Hindu saints including Sikh Guru Nanak Dev ji, and imposed Jaziya (a religious tax on Hindus to practice their religion). His trade policies were very discriminatory as he abolished specific duties on Muslim traders while doubling the same for Hindus.

In furtherance of his anti-non-Muslim policies, Babur destroyed the temple which is associated with birth of Lord Rama. Birthplace of Lord Rama, Ayodhya (Awadh) has been regarded as one of the seven most important pilgrimage sites (Saptapuri) for Hindus. Pilgrimage in Hindus is equal to Mecca Madina of Muslims. A birth spot of Lord Rama was marked by a temple which Babur destroyed to build the Babri Masjid upon it.

The answer to the question lies within the knowledge and study. The answer is same what a Muslim would do if some power takes over Mecca Madina, completely destroys it and after 500 years of encroachment tells you to build a university on its place. It is not about a symbol found under a construction, it is claimed to be the Birthplace of Lord Rama in many historian’s research.

Talking about scientific research no Muslim would be able to justify the presence of Mecca Madina without referring to their texts, so do Hindus. You can’t compare a Government (emperor) made a monument with what is “the religious” holy place of religion for thousands of years. Muslims had no existence in India when that temple was built and referring to the history of India we can see that Muslims destroyed many Hindu places to appease their anti-non-Muslim sentiments.
World’s largest university Nalanda was destroyed by Muslims
World’s largest university Nalanda was destroyed by Muslims
World’s largest university Nalanda was destroyed by Muslims too, only because it belonged to Hindus, do we need any further pieces of evidence on it?

The answer lies within you. Do you still want those atrocities to mark a presence today when all the differences can be abolished by accepting the wrongs that happened? It is not about Muslims losing their Allah’s own created building but it is completely about Hindus losing one of their 7 pilgrimages.

There’s no need of clash. The Mosque where Muslims want to worship their Gods can be shifted easily at the place offered in exchange as has been referred to in Muslim texts itself, while birthplaces can’t be shifted. The need of youth is not in engaging in wars against each other but to support each other by accepting that wrong thing happened and its right time we correct them for a harmonious co-existence. __Angrish

Post a Comment

Post a Comment (0)

#buttons=(Accept !) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies. Learn..
Accept !
To Top