Santur is an instrument indigenous to Kashmir, but nowadays played throughout the North. It is a hammered dulcimer which is struck with light wooden mallets. The number of strings may be as few as 24 or more than 100. Typical sizes tend to be around 80. It has a vibrant tone and has become very popular in the last 20 years.

One must not confuse the Indian santur with the Persian santur. The Indian santur is box-like while the Persian version is much wider.

Two playing positions are shown below:



In the first picture the instrument is resting on a small stand.  The second picture shows it being placed in the lap.  Sometimes it is placed directly on the floor.  The small wooden mallets are placed lightly between the index and middle fingers.  This is facilitated by two finger sized cut-outs in the mallets.  The mallets are shown below:

Tuning styles are extremely variable.  They are usually tuned to the particular rag and must therefore be retuned for each piece.  Furthermore different artists have their own styles of tuning.
The origin of the instrument is clear.  The name, structure, and technique point solidly to the Middle East.  Yet, there are those who attempt to trace its origins to an ancient Indian harp like instrument known as "Vana Veena".  There is absolutely no evidence for this latter view.  If we are to accept this proposition, then how are we to explain its 2000 year disappearance, followed by a miraculous reappearance in a form and usage that, by mere coincidence, is similar to the middle eastern santur?  It is clear that attempts to link the santur with this Vedic instrument are mere wishful thinking.

There are many people who cannot accept the concept of something great developing outside of India.

Watch Video:

The santoor is a recently developed instrument. It was introduced into Hindustani classical music only about forty- five to fifty years ago. Thus the instrument is yet to be standardised. The length, width and height of the instrument, number of bridges, number of strings, their order and thickness, i.e. gauge, the sitting posture of the player, the playing techniques all of these vary from artist to artist. Although the basic structure remains the same, the santoor adapted in Hindustani classical music differs from the Sufiana santoor in many ways. If we start with the number of strings and the number of bridges, we would find that the number of strings varies between eighty to a hundred whereas the number of bridges have increased from twenty-five to twenty-nine, thirty-one and sometimes even forty-two, forty-three, thus varying the number of strings stretched on each bridge consequently. Some bridges have three strings and some have two. In the lower octave for the thick strings, some artists prefer one string to one bridge. The soundbox of the classical santoor is either made out of the wood of the mulberry tree, walnut or tun. The plank (of both sides) is made of pine wood or walnut or even of plywood. Sometimes it is a mixture of all these kinds. As a covering for the front, sometimes red cedar is also used. The bridges are made of rosewood and on the top portion of the bridges little pieces of ivory, stag horn or bone are fixed which act as jawari. This is done for the fine tone of the strings. Nowadays, plastic and metal are also used for jawari, but the best effect comes from ivory. Strings are put in the pins on one side and tied to the tuning pegs across the board. These pins and pegs are made of iron with chromium coating and tuned with the help of a hammer-shaped tuner. For strikers mostly walnut wood and rosewood are used. Sometimes strikers made of mulberry wood are also used. Strikers of classical santoor are heavier than those used for the Sufiana santoor, as heavier strikers help sustain the notes.

Most artists prefer to keep the Instrument in their laps instead of on the triangular wooden stand of the Sufiana santoor. Thus the resonance of the Instrument is reduced intentionally, which helps the player produce more precise note to note sound, especially while playing quick succession of the notes (tanas). With the times, the tonal quality of the classical santoor has improved immensely. The techniques used in presenting the whole performance patterns of the Ragdari System, i.e. alap, jod and gat, the portions of slow and fast tempos, have also developed a great deal.

The santoor is the only Indian classical Instrument which is struck. It is a staccato instrument and cannot lend to techniques such as meend, gamak and andolan, which are very characteristic of Indian classical music. The purists are not happy at the intrusion of this instrument into the traditional domain of classical music. Santoor players are quite aware of this criticism and to deal with this problem, i.e. the lack of continuity of sound, each and every artist has introduced something or the other in the Instrument and in its technique.

Some of the artists use accessories like the rod of the slide guitar, to facilitate production of effects of meend (glide) while playing alap mostly in the lower octave. Some of them use contact mikes in order to get a more sustained sound. A number of experiments with the wood, strings and with the size and weight of bridges and strikers have been carried out by the artists to get a better tonal quality and sustenance of sound from the santoor.

GIVE US HAND BY SHARING THIS POST

Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterPlus on Google+

Post A Comment:

0 comments so far,add yours

Have something to add to this story? Share it in the comments. By Writing Your Comments with Registered User - includes OpenID